On Monday, 11 March 2013 at 15:21:31 UTC, FG wrote:
On 2013-03-11 16:11, Namespace wrote:
I've also done some benchmarks. And I wonder why my appender
is much faster if I
enable memory reservation.
Probably just because D's Appender has a better growth scheme
than yours and you reallocate too often. Try to compare how
often that happens.
D's:
24 extends, 9 moves (qalloc + memcpy).
My Appender:
25 moves.
But I do not think you can extend a memory block with C functions.
I'm also very interested to hear some improvements tips.
Well, you may add a check whether alloc/realloc actually
succeeded. :)
Maybe. :)
