On Thursday, 14 March 2013 at 20:59:38 UTC, Zach the Mystic wrote:
On Wednesday, 13 March 2013 at 22:14:26 UTC, Timon Gehr wrote:
On 03/12/2013 10:47 PM, Zach the Mystic wrote:
void func(string[2] a) {}
void func2(T...)(T args) {
static assert(is(typeof(args[0]) == string[2]));
}
void func3(T...)(T args) {
static assert(args[0].length == 2);
}
func(["",""]); // Okay
func2(["",""]); // Error: (is(string[] == string[2LU])) is
false
func3(["",""]); // Error: _param_0 cannot be read at compile
time
Is this the intended design?
Yes.
Is there a workaround which allows me to
ensure that the parameter is exactly 2 length?
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9712
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9711
Man, Hara Kenji is so fast!!!!!! I didn't even know my problem
wasn't just part of the design, and already it's close to being
a fixed bug/enhancement!
(I meant to thank you too, Timon Gehr)
