at least 'delete' is in the deprecated table (marked as will be deprecated some time in the future) so should opDot then.
On Wed, May 22, 2013 at 11:34 AM, Jonathan M Davis <jmdavisp...@gmx.com>wrote: > On Wednesday, May 22, 2013 18:18:34 timotheecour wrote: > > On Sunday, 19 May 2013 at 14:33:32 UTC, Ali Çehreli wrote: > > > On 05/19/2013 05:34 AM, Simen Kjaeraas wrote: > > >> Well, there is also opDot: > > > What is the state of opDot? According to the change log, it has > > > been introduced as a part of "Version D 2.013 Apr 22, 2008" > > > with the note "Added opDot, which is experimental only." > > > > > > I will keep assuming that opDot does not exist. :) (However, it > > > is being used by Unique an Ref in std.typecons.) > > > > > > Ali > > > > is there anything you can do with opDot that you can't with alias > > this? > > > > (aside from the ability to hide the member as being private, as > > raised in the OP; its a bit broken as mentioned 1 post above) > > > > if not, it should deprecate. > > opDot is definitely supposed to be deprecated: > > http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2327 > > but Daniel Murphy seems to have missed it on his list > (http://dlang.org/deprecate.html), and it hasn't actually been deprecated > yet > (but then again, even delet hasn't been deprecated yet, so that just goes > to > show how slow we are to deprecate language features that are definitely > supposed to get the axe). > > - Jonathan M Davis >
