On Friday, May 31, 2013 08:27:19 Ali Çehreli wrote: > I think it is the same issue with non-templated functions. The best > thing to do is to forget about the -property switch. I did about a year > ago and never looked back. :)
Given the most recent discussions on @property, I think that it's a foregone conclusion that we will never have strict property enforcement (which is what -property is trying to do), and -property will be going away at some point in the future. The general consensus is that folks want optional parens and not have that have anything to do with @property. I think that the only real question at this point is what happens with setters, as some folks want setters to be restricted to @property, and others just want to go to the behavior we had before @property and not need @property at all. For the most part, at this point, @property is looking like a failure. - Jonathan M Davis