On 06/19/2013 11:46 AM, Sean Kelly wrote: > Thread.sleep(dur!"msecs"(300));
Totally unrelated but there has been some positive changes. :) The following is much better:
Thread.sleep(300.msecs); Ali
On 06/19/2013 11:46 AM, Sean Kelly wrote: > Thread.sleep(dur!"msecs"(300));
Totally unrelated but there has been some positive changes. :) The following is much better:
Thread.sleep(300.msecs); Ali