On 06/28/2013 10:17 AM, Maxim Fomin wrote:
> Are you sure that the code is exact translation of demonstrated D
> problem?
Sorry. I omitted two points.
> I see difference in argument passing order and your version
> uses try-catch block.
1) C++ does not specify whether the stack gets unwound when the program
terminates with an uncaught exception. That's why I caught to ensure
that the stack objects would be destroyed.
2) C++ does not specify in what order function arguments are evaluated.
I swapped the parameters because I used gcc under Linux, where the
parameters are executed from right-to-left.
Ali
