On Monday, 15 July 2013 at 23:03:45 UTC, H. S. Teoh wrote:
I generally use R 'cos it's less typing and I'm lazy, but
Walter has
been recently of the opinion that a more descriptive name is
necessary
for ddoc purposes, e.g., MyStruct(InputRange)(InputRange r)
One thing about that is that the type is being encoded into the
name of the template parameter. Ideally, the type shouldn't be
important, with the template constraints documenting anything
noteworthy. With MyStruct, for example, I think
MyStruct(Range)(Range r) would be better than the former, as it's
more general. Then a template constraint such as
if(isInputRange!Range) documents that the type must be at least
an input range.
