On Tuesday, 23 July 2013 at 17:06:37 UTC, Dicebot wrote:
On Tuesday, 23 July 2013 at 17:03:52 UTC, John Colvin wrote:Sorry, I should have been more clear. It's the first case that seems weird to me.Why? '*aptr' is 'a' pretty much by definition of pointer dereferencing.
To be honest, I wasn't expecting foo(*aptr) to compile at all, with a "taking address of temporary" error or similar.
It's clearly the right behaviour to allow it, but it took me by surprise at first.
