On 30/08/13 23:51, bearophile wrote:
Perhaps can shorten that code writing a hasMembers helper (and I suggest to keep those names sorted)
Nice thought, I might look into that at some point. :-)
On 30/08/13 23:51, bearophile wrote:
Perhaps can shorten that code writing a hasMembers helper (and I suggest to keep those names sorted)
Nice thought, I might look into that at some point. :-)