On 9/8/13, Namespace <rswhi...@googlemail.com> wrote: > What is the problem? If the compiler is able to cast implicit > from ushort to short, what is the problem of casting ushort[2] to > short[2]?
Oh I didn't even noticed it was a signed/unsigned issue. I'm not sure whether or not it's a bug. But file it anyways and someone will know what to do with it.
