Am 28.09.2013 11:16, schrieb Joseph Rushton Wakeling:
On 27/09/13 21:13, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
No, it should not be executable. The only time that it makes sense for
a .d
file to be executable is when it's a script with something like
#!/bin/rdmd at
the top, which certainly isn't the case for windows.d.
Is testing for correct permissions something that can be included in the
auto-tester? Seems likely that it could happen again by accident if
someone edits windows.d on Windows (which is probably the most typical
place to edit it).
Wouldn't it make more sense to automatically remove execute permission
instead of testing against them? For someone only developing on windows
it will not help when the autotester rejects the pull request just
because it hase been made from a windows machine.
