On Wednesday, 16 October 2013 at 17:50:48 UTC, Daniel Davidson
wrote:
On Wednesday, 16 October 2013 at 17:16:39 UTC, Dicebot wrote:
It works as it should. Make a mutable copy of t2 and pass it.
Or make foo() accept const. I can't imagine a single
legitimate use case for destroying type system in a way you
want.
How do you propose to make a mutable copy *generically*?
Recursively going through the levels of indirection via static
introspection and allocating memory for new mutable counter-parts
as it goes. Maybe it should belong to Phobos, no idea right now,
will know once I ever find the need for it.
