> But can you think of a more simple/elegant workaround? > > Is a standard lazy struct range authorized?
- [challenge] Lazy flatten/avoiding type forward reference w... David Nadlinger
- Re: [challenge] Lazy flatten/avoiding type forward re... Ali Çehreli
- Re: [challenge] Lazy flatten/avoiding type forward re... Philippe Sigaud
- Re: [challenge] Lazy flatten/avoiding type forward re... David Nadlinger
- Re: [challenge] Lazy flatten/avoiding type forwar... Andrej Mitrovic
