On Thursday, November 28, 2013 19:53:48 Dicebot wrote:
> On Thursday, 28 November 2013 at 18:26:15 UTC, Joseph Rushton
>
> Wakeling wrote:
> > I think it may actually be a bug in whether -release implies
> > version(release).
> > Try out the attached code. (r)dmd -release release.d produces
> > an executable
> > that still reports that release mode is disabled.
>
> There is no pre-defined version(release) in D according to spec.
The closest you would get would be
version(assert) {}
else { /* release */ }
- Jonathan M Davis
