Re: Type inference and overloaded functions

[Namespace]

On Thursday, 12 December 2013 at 15:35:52 UTC, bearophile wrote:
Ali Çehreli:
But look at the assertion: the type of the *slice* arr2 is 
int[3]. :)

I didn't notice that. It looks strange... I don't understand it.

Bye,
bearophile

I already pointed out why it was that way AND that it's "fixed" 
now. ;)