On Saturday, 14 December 2013 at 00:24:01 UTC, Andrea Fontana
wrote:
Just another thought. If we have:
class B;
struct C;
class A
{
void method() const { ... }
B another_class;
C a_struct;
}
B is just a reference to a object, so method() should not
reassign it. The reference should be const, not the object
itself. method() should be able to call mutable another_class
methods. Am I wrong?
Yes, in D, all members of a const object are const too. So inside
method() const, another_class is const. Which means
another_class.member is also const.
