Still need help. I've tried compiling a little test project with dub and it compiled. Then i tried to compile it by hand and got the same error.
I think there is some issue in my command with parameter ordering.

Here is test project

module test;

import derelict.glfw3.glfw3;
import std.stdio;

void main() {
        DerelictGLFW3.load();
        writeln("test");
}

with package

{
        "targetName": "test",
        "dependencies": {
                "derelict-glfw3": "~master"
        },
        "targetType":"executable",
        "name": "test",
        "sourceFiles":["./test.d"]
}

The dub does two step compilation:
dmd -m32 -of.dub/build/application-debug-x86-dmd-DA39A3EE5E6B4B0D3255BFEF95601890AFD80709/test -c -of.dub/build/application-debug-x86-dmd-DA39A3EE5E6B4B0D3255BFEF95601890AFD80709/test.o -debug -g -w -version=Have_test -version=Have_derelict_glfw3 -version=Have_derelict_util -I../../.dub/packages/derelict-glfw3-master/source -I../../.dub/packages/derelict-util-1.0.0/source test.d ../../.dub/packages/derelict-glfw3-master/source/derelict/glfw3/package.d ../../.dub/packages/derelict-glfw3-master/source/derelict/glfw3/glfw3.d ../../.dub/packages/derelict-util-1.0.0/source/derelict/util/xtypes.d ../../.dub/packages/derelict-util-1.0.0/source/derelict/util/exception.d ../../.dub/packages/derelict-util-1.0.0/source/derelict/util/system.d ../../.dub/packages/derelict-util-1.0.0/source/derelict/util/loader.d ../../.dub/packages/derelict-util-1.0.0/source/derelict/util/sharedlib.d ../../.dub/packages/derelict-util-1.0.0/source/derelict/util/wintypes.d
Linking...
dmd -of.dub/build/application-debug-x86-dmd-DA39A3EE5E6B4B0D3255BFEF95601890AFD80709/test .dub/build/application-debug-x86-dmd-DA39A3EE5E6B4B0D3255BFEF95601890AFD80709/test.o -L-ldl -m32 -g Copying target from /home/andrey/test/.dub/build/application-debug-x86-dmd-DA39A3EE5E6B4B0D3255BFEF95601890AFD80709/test to /home/andrey/test


So, do i need to use two step compilation or i need proper ordering of parameters?
One more question: why dub uses -of flag twice?

Reply via email to