On Sunday, 26 January 2014 at 14:13:28 UTC, Stanislav Blinov wrote:
On Sunday, 26 January 2014 at 13:45:32 UTC, matovitch wrote:

Anyway, the proposed solutions use twice much memory than a simple for loop...

???


Well in a for loop, you only need one more index variable whereas here we store the whole index range.

Reply via email to