On Monday, 17 February 2014 at 07:15:20 UTC, Steve Teale wrote:
Why is it that with 32 bit compilation, int is 32 bits, but
apparently this convention is not followed in 64 bit
compilation.
I have not installed the 64 bit compiler yet, but apparently
int len = parent.children.length+1;
provokes the following error
acomp.d(782): Error: cannot implicitly convert expression
(parent.children.length + 1LU) of type ulong to int
parent is just a straightforward array
What is size_t for 64 bit?
Steve
it is equal to machine word size. 4 bytes on x86, 8 on x64.
but it looks like length is not size_t but ulong in which case
you need explicit cast from larget to smaller type. check lenght
signature
