On Friday, 28 February 2014 at 13:23:51 UTC, Dicebot wrote:
On Friday, 28 February 2014 at 12:52:38 UTC, Remo wrote:
On Friday, 28 February 2014 at 11:59:40 UTC, Dicebot wrote:
On Friday, 28 February 2014 at 01:16:41 UTC, Mike Parker
wrote:
Ideally, I'd love for the compiler to pick up on this idiom
and not generate any typeinfo in this situation.
Ideally one should use modules as namespaces :P
Ideally D should have build in namespaces.
Using class to mimic namespace, but then all the functions are
virtual per default ?
No. By design namespace is a module. You don't use classes for
namespaces, you create more modules. One may not like it but it
is how D module system was created and it was intentional.
Right now I do not really miss namespacec in D.
I like modules in D.
What I hate already are problems with structs and ctors.
Most time while porting C++ code to D I spend a lot of time to
resolve all the problems that happens because of struct ctors.
If I forget to do this then it still compiles but does not work
at all...
