Re: Syntactic Sugar for Construction of Empty Dynamic Arrays of a Given Type

[Nordlöw]

Ok. Enough for now...but Is there a way to avoid this array special handling:

                static if (isArray!R)
                    _range = (D[]).init;
                else
                    _range = R(); // return empty range

through some initializer expression for _range that covers both

    R()

and

    (D[]).init

?

The answer was right in front of me...

_range = R.init