On 2014-04-02 20:48, monarch_dodra wrote:
On Wednesday, 2 April 2014 at 19:54:38 UTC, monarch_dodra wrote:
On Wednesday, 2 April 2014 at 19:02:29 UTC, Simen Kjærås wrote:
Better ideas, please?
--
Simen
I only skimmed through your post, but have you tried taking a look at
adjoin? Preferably, the version in head? Something like
"adjoin!(repeat!(fun, N))" seems to natively do what you are asking for?
I'll re-read your post later tonight, and if I'm misunderstood, I'll
try to provide a better solution.
Indeed, "assert(adjoin!(Repeat!(3, ()=>a++))() == tuple(0,1,2));" seems
to work for me.
That said, while I think the behavior is *defined*, I'm not sure it's
*specified*.
True, in the case of a++, it's probably a bad idea. In my case, the
function is uniform(0.0, 1.0, rng), and I'm happy with it simply being
random.
Thanks a lot!
--
Simen
