Am 23.05.2014 16:44, schrieb Rene Zwanenburg:
On Friday, 23 May 2014 at 14:38:27 UTC, Andre wrote:
Am 23.05.2014 16:34, schrieb Rene Zwanenburg:
In case there is a reason that the assertion is not run,
if feels very dangerous for me that all assertions can be
disabled by mistake just by adding an interface to a class.
At least a compiler messsage should be thrown to warn about
"useless" assertions
Kind regards
André
I completely agree. A quick search on the issue tracker shows there are
some serious bugs involving in contracts and interfaces[0]. It's
probably best to keep away from them until the situation improves.
[0]:
https://issues.dlang.org/buglist.cgi?quicksearch=in%20contract%20interface
): I found my issue: https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12321
I just think about whether it is possible to build a contracts library
similiar to C4J (Contracts 4 Java).
I like the classed based approach.
Kind regards
André
