On 06/10/2014 01:48 PM, monarch_dodra wrote: > I am ***INCREDIBLY*** glad D's stance is simply "depth first left to > right".
I completely agree. > It *supports* C style, but unless you are copy pasting some C > code, you'd have to be mad in your head to actually ever use it. > > Honestly, try to declare: > *A two element array of pointers to int > *A pointer to a two element array of ints > > Tip: the solutions are in this set: > int *arr1[2]; > int (*arr2)[2]; > int *(arr3[2]); Madness! :) > Also, the syntax is *so* horrible, the syntax is actually deprecated in > D. And that's saying a lot, when you know how much Walter hates breaking > code... Going off topic, browse this thread for more fun: :p http://stackoverflow.com/questions/10758811/c-syntax-for-functions-returning-function-pointers int (*(*(*f3)(int))(double))(float); "f3 is a ..." Ali
