On Wednesday, 18 June 2014 at 14:05:12 UTC, Rene Zwanenburg wrote:
On Tuesday, 17 June 2014 at 13:07:33 UTC, Marc Schütz wrote:
On Monday, 16 June 2014 at 23:04:33 UTC, Rene Zwanenburg wrote:
This one depends on taste, but these helpers can be
eliminated by changing the Header definition a little. It's
the same union / anonymous struct trick from the previous
post, only this time with bitfields:
http://dpaste.dzfl.pl/13258b0ce0c4
If you define nested structs/unions, it's better to make them
static whenever possible, because non-static nested structs
have an additional hidden field for the context.
Good call. In this case it doesn't add the hidden field, but
for the sake of consistency I agree it's better to add static.
Interesting, I thought it's there for all nested structs. But I
see it's only added if the struct has a method, but then it's
always there, no matter whether the methods actually accesses the
outer context. Probably for consistency reasons...
