On Wednesday, 9 July 2014 at 13:18:00 UTC, Larry wrote:
You are definitely right, I did mess up while translating !
I run the corrected codes (the ones I was meant to provide :S)
and on a slow macbook I end up with :
C : 2
D : 15994
Of course when run on very high end machines, this diff is
almost non existent but we want to run on very low powered
hardware.
Ok, even with a longer code, there will always be a launch
penalty for d. So I cannot use it for very high performance
loops.
Shame for us..
:)
Thanks and bye
This to me pretty much confirms that almost the entirety of your
C code is being optimized out and thus not actually executing.
