On Saturday, 9 August 2014 at 09:11:53 UTC, Marc Schütz wrote:
On Saturday, 9 August 2014 at 03:46:05 UTC, timotheecour wrote:
On Wednesday, 6 August 2014 at 17:03:23 UTC, Timothee Cour via
Digitalmars-d-learn wrote:
Is there a reason why 'with(Foo):' is not allowed, and we
have to
use with(Foo){...} ?
It would be more in line with how other scope definitions
work (extern(C)
etc)
ping, anyone?
Probably for syntactic reasons: `with` is a statement, while
`extern(C)`, `@safe`, `private` etc. are attributes.
But the idea is certainly nice, it would only require a simple
rewriting rule.
Also a way to cancel such...
struct Foo {
@nogc:
void bar() {
with (someEnum):
// ...
!:with (someEnum) // ?
// ...
}
!:@nogc // ?
void gcFunction() { /*...*/ }
}