On Wednesday, 27 August 2014 at 13:49:48 UTC, Aerolite wrote:
Hey all,
I just read the wiki article on DIP64 -
http://wiki.dlang.org/DIP64
The discrepancy between the annotation-style attributes such as
'@safe', '@property', etc and the keyword attributes 'pure' and
'nothrow' has always really bugged me ever since I started using
D.
How likely is it that DIP64 will be accepted and implemented?
Or,
more specifically, how much does this discrepancy bother others,
including Walter and Andrei? Or is the author of this DIP wrong
in his assessment that 'pure' and 'nothrow' are in fact standard
attributes?
I bothers the heck outta my OCD. :)
