On Wednesday, 3 September 2014 at 20:20:09 UTC, Meta wrote:
Does this work?s ~= "*".replicate(n);
Yes, thanks. So what's best? type ~= '*'.repeat(pointerCount).array; or type ~= "*".replicate(pointerCount); ? Further, -vgc says only ~= will allocate:t_repeat_replicate.d(12,19): vgc: operator ~= may cause GC allocation t_repeat_replicate.d(13,19): vgc: operator ~= may cause GC allocation
Is DMD/Phobos already that clever!? :=)