On Wed, Sep 17, 2014 at 07:23:01PM +0000, "Nordlöw" via Digitalmars-d-learn wrote: > On Wednesday, 17 September 2014 at 15:27:40 UTC, Justin Whear wrote: > >These containers are all certified GC-free. > > Superb! > > One question though: > > AFAIK a builtin hash-table in D shouldn't require nor use any > GC-allocations if the keys and values all have reference semantics > right (no string class, nor member indirections)? What is the current > status on this in dmd/druntime?
How do you implement a completely GC-free AA with no limit on number of entries stored? I mean, where would it get the memory to store the hashtable from? T -- Once bitten, twice cry...
