On Saturday, 20 September 2014 at 18:59:03 UTC, Nordlöw wrote:
Is there a reason why popFront doesn't automatically return
what front does?
If so I'm still missing a combined variant of pop and popFront
in std.range.
Why isn't such a common operation in Phobos already?
Sometimes after popping, the previous `front` is no longer valid,
such as in the case of a buffer being reused. We should be
careful about promoting using a previously read `front` after
`popFront` until we figure out what we want to do about these
"transient ranges".
If you want move semantics, use `moveFront`.
