Marc Schütz:
Alternatively, you could create a union with a private and a
public member with the same types, but I wouldn't recommend it.
Besides, the members would need to have different names:
class Foo {
union {
private int a;
public int b;
}
}
You can call them a and a_. Why are you not recommending this solution? It looks cool (if it works).
Bye, bearophile
