On Sun, 12 Oct 2014 21:30:44 -0400 Steven Schveighoffer via Digitalmars-d-learn <digitalmars-d-learn@puremagic.com> wrote:
> At least someone else has found a similar issue before: > https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10689 hm. i somehow missed this in my searches. thanks. > I'm not sure what proper syntax would be, perhaps: > auto a = (new A)!foo("xFn"); how about: `auto a = new A.this!foo("xFn");`? there is no harm in specifying constructor name for resolving ambiguity here. and it still allows `auto a = new A!int.this!foo("xFn");` for example. and it's not breaking any existing code, afaik. i'm sure that this is not a complex patch. let's hope someone will write it and convince Walter to accept it.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
