C++ versions:
{ //displays ~C~B~A
A foo;
B bar;
C *caz = new C();
delete caz;
}
std::cout << std::endl;
{ //displays ~C~B~A
std::unique_ptr<A> foo = std::make_unique<A>();
std::unique_ptr<B> bar = std::make_unique<B>();
C *caz = new C();
delete caz;
}
D version:
{ //displays ~A~B~C
A foo = scoped!(A)();
B bar = scoped!(B)();
C caz = new C();
destroy(caz);
}
Why the objects are not destroyed in the inverse order of their
creation? Case in point, destroying foo releases a lock for bar
and caz.
