On Wednesday, 5 November 2014 at 14:24:00 UTC, Sean Kelly wrote:
On Wednesday, 5 November 2014 at 09:45:50 UTC, Mike wrote:
Greetings,
In core.varar.
(https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/druntime/blob/master/src/core/vararg.d),
why is the X86 implementation singled out and written in D
rather than leveraging the standard c library implementation
like the others?
No idea. It seems like a pointless duplication of code. Maybe
just to have some documented functions within the module?
In that case, a better question is "Why use the standard C
implementation if we have working D code?".
