On Wed, 3 Dec 2014 08:14:53 +0530 Shriramana Sharma via Digitalmars-d-learn <digitalmars-d-learn@puremagic.com> wrote:
> Heh -- fine for whatever compiler tools *you* create, but if someone > else creates it, and is willing to distribute it under a more liberal > license, why should you find it unacceptable, I'm not sure! 'cause BSDL-likes allows proprietary forks. i don't trust proprietary vendors and i don't want 'em to create slightly incompatible closed fork which is "better". they have either do all the work by themselves and release proprietary product from the start, or have no legal way to fork and close the work of the other people. i'm not against BSDL-likes per se, the only things i don't want with such licenses are compiler tools. so i'm not using LLVM-based compilers, i'm not interested in LLVM-based compilers, and such compilers are pretty much non-existant in my world.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
