On Saturday, December 13, 2014 02:34:21 Jeremy DeHaan via Digitalmars-d-learn wrote: > Is this on purpose? Granted, I almost never use interface files, > but I had a whim to use them for what I was working on today. > > Everything worked fine when I renamed the file to package.d, but > apparently package.di is not acceptible.
It probably was never considered. But given that all that's really supposed to be put in a package.d file is public imports, it's not like supporting package.di really adds much, though arguably it should work for consistency's sake. - Jonathan M Davis
