On Tue, 13 Jan 2015 20:52:13 +0000
Dominikus Dittes Scherkl via Digitalmars-d-learn
<digitalmars-d-learn@puremagic.com> wrote:

> On Tuesday, 13 January 2015 at 20:11:45 UTC, anonymous wrote:
> > On Tuesday, 13 January 2015 at 20:00:57 UTC, Dominikus Dittes 
> > Scherkl wrote:
> >> So if I have a function that allowes to do this:
> >>
> >> uint a;
> >> a.bit[16] = true;
> >> writeln(a); // 65536
> >>
> >> Is it also already available?
> >
> > a |= 1 << 16;
> 
> Of course you can calculate it, but the
> syntax looks quite different if you want to do
> a.bit[22] = false:
> 
> a &= ~(1<<16);
> 
> Or if you want to test a bit:
> 
> if(a.bit[16])
> 
> instead of
> 
> if(a & (1<<16))
> 
> much more convenient for arrays:
> 
> ulong[100] a;
> 
> a.bit[3000] = true;
> 
> doing this directly with shifts is lousy (and error prone)
> 
> But ok. I see, it's not really awesome :-/
it's not better than using something like this:

  a.bitSet(22);
  a.bitReset(30);
  if (a.bit(16)) { ... }

you can easily do this with UFCS. you can even write some templates to
convert it to bit operations in compile time.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to