Playing with factorial implementations, as you do. I had a D implementation using ulong. Not sensible obviously since overflow is a bit of a problem. But the code worked, as did the tests. Now converting to BigInt and…
The standard explicit iteration form uses a loop:
for(i; 2..n+1)
for n = 0 or 1 this loop doesn't loop since the range is [,). However
for BigInt:
for(i; two..n + one)
the loop starts at 0 and just keeps on going. This is clearly not good.
Am I having a mental breakdown or is this a real bug?
--
Russel.
=============================================================================
Dr Russel Winder t: +44 20 7585 2200 voip: sip:russel.win...@ekiga.net
41 Buckmaster Road m: +44 7770 465 077 xmpp: rus...@winder.org.uk
London SW11 1EN, UK w: www.russel.org.uk skype: russel_winder
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
