On Monday, 26 January 2015 at 21:55:19 UTC, anonymous wrote:
On Monday, 26 January 2015 at 21:33:10 UTC, Piotrek wrote:
On Monday, 26 January 2015 at 14:11:32 UTC, bearophile wrote:
Non-static structs/classes have an extra pointer.
Bye,
bearophile
Since when structs have an extra pointer? Maybe you are
talking about nested structs?
Non-static means nested.
Hmm,this can be misleading. Nesting in structs doesn't introduce
context pointer.
But I agree that if we take into account a hypothetical inferred
static attribute for "nesting in struct" and the module scope
cases, then the static and non-static classification looks the
most suitable.
Piotrek
