On 02/07/2015 04:46 AM, Mike wrote:

> B)-----------------------------------------
> struct StaticRegister {
>      static private uint _value;
>      @property static uint value() { return _value; }
>      @property static void value(uint v) { _value = v; }
>
>      alias value this;
> }
>
> void main(string[] s) {
>      StaticRegister = 1;
>      assert(StaticRegister == 1);
> }
> -------------------------------------------
>
> ... the assignment error is eliminated, but the read is not.

I bet it's an unintentional implementation artifact. Assigning to a type doesn't make sense to me.

> I argue that either both errors should be eliminated, or neither should
> be eliminated.

It is not hard to create strange D code. I recommend the following lightning talk for fun. :) Brian Schott at DConf 2014:

  http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oF8K4-bieaw#t=1620

> Now, in the example below, `this` is referring to the type itself in a
> static context

Not exactly "type itself" because you apply typeof() to it later below. I this 'this' means "the type of the object if it were not a static function". :/

> C)-------------------------------------------
> import std.stdio;
>
> struct StaticRegister {
>      static string GetType() { return typeof(this).stringof; }
> }
>
> void main(string[] s) {
>      writeln(StaticRegister.GetType());
> }
> -------------------------------------------
>
> So, it follows that the example below should work... and it does
> D)-------------------------------------------
> struct StaticRegister {
>      static private uint _value = 0;
>      @property static uint value() { return _value; }
>      @property static void value(uint v) { _value= v; }
>
>      static uint GetValue() {
>          return this.value;

That works by accident. I am surprised that 'this' works in a static function. In any case, it should better be null.

Ok, it's good that 'this' is not available:

        assert(this is null);

Error: 'this' is only defined in non-static member functions, not foo

Phew... :) So, 'this.value' works by accident because the compiler reaches for *static* value() without evaluating 'this'.

Ali

Reply via email to