On 02.03.2015 14:51, Jonathan M Davis via Digitalmars-d-learn wrote:
On Monday, March 02, 2015 14:20:45 drug via Digitalmars-d-learn wrote:
I'm just trying to study constness in D and periodically fails with it.
Thanks for answer.
Then I guess that constness in D is in the finished form, hasn't some
pitfalls, won't be changed significantly in some future and so I just
need to learn it and understand it?
Pretty much, yeah. const in D is what it's going to be. That involves some
pros and cons in comparison to what C++ has, so in some ways it's going to
be better, and in others, it's going to be frustrating in its restrictions
(e.g. it doesn't work with anything that would require the mutable keyword
in C++), but it's the way that it's going to be in D.
- Jonathan M Davis
Yes, const in D is both exciting and frustrating thing. Thanks again.
