On Wednesday, 1 April 2015 at 14:22:57 UTC, Laeeth Isharc wrote:
On Wednesday, 1 April 2015 at 10:35:05 UTC, John Colvin wrote:
On Wednesday, 1 April 2015 at 10:09:12 UTC, FG wrote:
On 2015-03-31 at 22:56, Laeeth Isharc wrote:
1mm allocations
2.066: 0.844s
2.067: 0.19s
That is great news, thanks!
OT: it's a nasty financier's habit to write 1M and 1MM
instead of 1k and 1M. :P
Yeah, what's with that? I've never seen it before.
One cannot entirely escape déformation professionnelle ;)
[People mostly write 1,000 but 1mm although 1m is pedantically
correct for 1,000). Better internalize the conventions if one
doesn't want to avoid expensive mistakes under pressure.
well yes, who doesn't always not want to never avoid mistakes? ;)
Anyway, as I'm sure you know, the rest of the world assumes
SI/metric, or binary in special cases (damn those JEDEC guys!):
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Template:Bit_and_byte_prefixes
