On Saturday, 2 May 2015 at 10:18:07 UTC, Per Nordlöw wrote:
On Friday, 1 May 2015 at 19:30:08 UTC, Ilya Yaroshenko wrote:Both variants are wrong because uniq needs sorted ranges.Probably you need something like that: x = x.chain(y).sort.uniq.array;Interesting. Is x = x.chain(y).sort faster than x ~= y; x.sort; ? If so why?
Probably the latter is slower than the former, at the very least because the latter requires memory allocation whereas the former does not.
