On Monday, 11 May 2015 at 10:30:11 UTC, Daniel Kozak wrote:
On Monday, 11 May 2015 at 10:24:57 UTC, Daniel Kozák wrote:
On Mon, 11 May 2015 09:40:28 +0000
tcak via Digitalmars-d-learn
<digitalmars-d-learn@puremagic.com> wrote:
But yes I would say, it is not intentional behaviour. It
should use
weak reference, so It would be possible for GC to collect it.
Please
fill issue
And on 2.066.1 it works correctly, so it is a regression
I really didn't know that `destroy` would make any difference.
But I made changes in my libraries. Before null'g objects, I used
`destroy` as well, and memory consumption is not increasing at
all. Cheers for that ;)
I think `destroy`'s behaviour should be documented much better.
If I can reach to my bugzilla account (Everytime I forget my
password), I will report it now.
