On Wednesday, 20 May 2015 at 09:35:48 UTC, Jonathan M Davis wrote:

Well, if

printVal!(int*)(px);

prints 100, then that's a bug. It should print the address. In fact, it should be _impossible_ for the second overload of printVal to ever be
instantiated

IMHO thats not true, it should print 100. This is what spec say.

void printVal(T : T*)(T* t) {
    writeln(*t);
}

T is deduce to be int so we have

void printVal(int* t) {
    writeln(*t);
}

which will print value not address

Reply via email to