On Monday, 8 June 2015 at 20:11:31 UTC, Oleg B wrote:
On Monday, 8 June 2015 at 13:37:40 UTC, Marc Schütz wrote:
On Monday, 8 June 2015 at 12:24:56 UTC, Oleg B wrote:
I guess you should follow andrei's post about new allocators!
Can you get link to this post?
These are some of his posts:
http://forum.dlang.org/thread/mku0n4$s35$1...@digitalmars.com
http://forum.dlang.org/thread/mkl1eh$1mdl$2...@digitalmars.com
http://forum.dlang.org/thread/mjig8h$2rgi$1...@digitalmars.com
http://forum.dlang.org/thread/mjdcep$11ri$1...@digitalmars.com
http://forum.dlang.org/thread/mj3p2j$2qva$1...@digitalmars.com
http://forum.dlang.org/thread/mir0lg$2l74$1...@digitalmars.com
http://forum.dlang.org/thread/min9k8$9r9$1...@digitalmars.com
Thank! Can you say how long wait (on average) to experimental
modules will cease be an experimental and will be part of
phobos? At next release or it unknown?
Don't know in general. This one isn't even in Phobos yet, but
OTOH it is a feature that's very much in demand, so the process
might be sped up. Maybe it could even go directly to
std.allocator instead of std.experimental.allocator...
