On Friday, 26 June 2015 at 11:13:11 UTC, Per Nordlöw wrote:
On Friday, 26 June 2015 at 10:23:26 UTC, Laeeth Isharc wrote:
On Friday, 26 June 2015 at 09:06:18 UTC, Per Nordlöw wrote:
On Thursday, 25 June 2015 at 23:23:01 UTC, Laeeth Isharc
wrote:
not sure if this is quite what you are looking for, or if
the performance overhead is acceptable but have you looked
at msgpack to go on top of a lower level pipe ?
Why is a lower-level pipe needed, when we have pipe in
std.process?
well, that is the sort of lower level pipe I was referring to.
Ok, thanks.
It should be easy enough to write so you can switch out the
transport protocol. You could use something like nanomsg if you
are prepared to use a beta product. I wrote some D bindings, but
they are pretty raw and haven't been used much except for tiny
applications. Fantastic if you feel like giving them a try and
improving them. However if you don't like them you can just call
nanomsg C api directly. But nanomsg itself is still early stage.
http://nanomsg.org/index.html
http://java.dzone.com/articles/look-nanomsg-and-scalability
https://github.com/Laeeth/d-nanomsg
