On Wednesday, 22 July 2015 at 09:04:49 UTC, Marc Schütz wrote:
On Tuesday, 21 July 2015 at 21:50:35 UTC, rsw0x wrote:
On Tuesday, 21 July 2015 at 21:44:07 UTC, rsw0x wrote:
[...]
addendum:
http://dlang.org/garbage.html
[...]
[...]
I believe this implies that it would *not* keep the object
alive.
Sorry for the confusion/noise.
But as long as the original pointer is still on the stack, that
one _will_ keep the object alive. It is only a problem if all
pointers to a GC managed object are stored in places the GC
isn't informed about.
correct, I managed to confuse myself :o)
