On Thursday 20 August 2015 23:11, anonymous wrote:

> 2) *integer++ doesn't do what you think it does. The increment is done
> before the dereference. You could fix this, but:

I got that one wrong. Steven Schveighoffer has it right. The pointer is 
incremented after the currently pointed-to value is returned. Still not what 
was expected, of course.

Reply via email to